Skip to main content

Is This Plant Real or Plastic? A Real Plastic Response of Carnivorous Plants

 Throughout our class we have obviously been talking about phenotypic plasticity within the animal kingdom, but what about plants!? Plants are incredibly divers and have covered virtually every inch of the world's surface (with some really cold exceptions). I started to wonder about phenotypic plasticity in plants. I remembered back in my dendrology class how leaves at the base of a tree will be more etiolated (elongation of leaves / stems) than leaves in the canopy to better collect sunlight in a shaded environment. This caused me to dig into the literature of plant plasticity. Surprisingly, carnivorous plants of the North American genus Sarracenia is at the center of this research. Just like how amphibians are often used to describe plasticity because of their "two-life" strategy, so are carnivorous plants. Sarracenia compensates for living in N poor soils by trapping inverts, however these plants still need and use their modified leaves (hoods) for photosynthesis. 

    Ellison et al. 2004 found morphological differences in Sarracenia purpurea across their range, specifically hood thickness, wing size, size of pitcher opening, and hood length. This is obviously interpreted as adaptive responses to different environmental conditions across this species' range. These differences are largely explained by soil nutrient availability where nutrient rich sites create larger winged hoods better for photosynthesis and cooler temps have thicker walled hoods to prevent frost damage. 

    However, Bott et al. 2008 tested plasticity of this species by conducting a reciprocal transplant experiment where they moved species from more nutrient poor sites to nutrient rich and visa versa. This experiment lasted for two years, showing short term morphological changes. Leaf length, pitcher aperture (how narrow the hood is), and wing width changed in each plant to match the native conspecifics in the habitat they were transplanted to. These morphological changes are consistent with previous findings that larger pitcher aperture aids in prey capture within more nutrient poor sites and wider wings in nutrient rich environments aid in better photosynthesis. This offers evidence that a long lived perennial like the purple pitcher plant can adapt year to year by optimizing pitcher leaf structure to best take advantage of the environment it is in.

Plants are cool.



Bott, T., Meyer, G.A., Young, E.B., 2008. Nutrient limitation and morphological plasticity of the carnivorous pitcher plantSarracenia purpureain contrasting wetland environments. New Phytologist 180, 631–641.. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02575.x

Ellison AM, Buckley HL, Miller TE, Gotelli NJ. Morphological variation in Sarracenia purpurea (Sarraceniaceae): Geographic, environmental, and taxonomic correlates American Journal of Botany. 2004 Nov;91(11):1930-1935. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.91.11.193


Comments

  1. AdamMarch 27, 2021 at 12:10 PM

    Cool post. I never thought of plants in terms of plasticity. As I was reading I struggled to understand the pitcher aperture plasticity. If insects are a source of nutrients like nitrogen, wouldn't it make sense for them to always grow a large aperture regardless of environment? Or is there a tradeoff energetically/fitness-wise with having a large opening versus a small opening? If they invest more towards forming a large opening I could see how this type of change would be necessary to adapt to the environment. Enlighten me!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Environmental Trade-offs of Increased Antidepressant Use

       I came across an interesting sentiment the other day. In response to the generational expression  “kids have it so easy nowadays” someone replied “that’s the point”. The point of progressing is to make life easier for the next generation. While today’s kids don’t have to walk uphill both ways to get to school, they face their own unique obstacles with the constant pressures from social media and threat of school shootings. The 2021 State Of Mental Health In America survey reports that youth depression is worsening. Statistics show that this disproportionately affects youths who identify as more than one race. However, some statistical growth can be attributed to an increase in diagnoses as the stigma of mental health has changed and more people seek treatment. Along with better access to therapy, access to a variety of antidepressants has increased as well. The CDC reports that from 1999 to 2014 antidepressant use has increased by almost 65% with one in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Change is good...just ask a baby turtle

  Change is good, or so the old adage goes. But is that really true, or is it something said to create a silver lining when the world seems to be shifting at an uncomfortable pace. Not all change is good (just ask the climate), but for some creatures, a little variance can go a long way. Take, for example, the common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ). A recent study by Leivesley and Rollinson (2021) found that mimicking natural temperature fluctuations in incubating eggs had a beneficial effect in early-age immune response. The authors were interested in using immune response as a marker of fitness under the Charnov-Bull model. Their experimental design included four groups: a male promoting temperature (MPT; 24⁰ C) and a female promoting temperature (FPT; 28⁰ C), each split into constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Half of the eggs in each group were treated with an aromatase inhibitor, which effectively prevents female development even at the FPT. The idea is that ...
2 comments
Read more

The Fate of the Honey Bee

   There is often chatter about the need to protect whatever charismatic species has recently been marketed into public attention, and if lucky public concern. Often characterized as charismatic megafauna, species like the bengal tiger, the giant panda, or the humpback whale are flagship species of conservation programs. These species garner affection and concern so successfully that they introduce a degree of taxonomic bias in environmental protection. On the other hand, there are species that have been branded “uninteresting, strange, or ugly” making them uniquely difficult to protect (Purdue. 2016).        In the age of social media, charismatic species have been given a new platform. In the case of the honey bee, you might say the conversation is abuzz. Since 2007, Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) has become a serious source of concern and discourse (Bee-Health. 2019). And I often wonder, how did this species, being so taxonomically different from it’s ch...
1 comment
Read more