Skip to main content

Is This Plant Real or Plastic? A Real Plastic Response of Carnivorous Plants

 Throughout our class we have obviously been talking about phenotypic plasticity within the animal kingdom, but what about plants!? Plants are incredibly divers and have covered virtually every inch of the world's surface (with some really cold exceptions). I started to wonder about phenotypic plasticity in plants. I remembered back in my dendrology class how leaves at the base of a tree will be more etiolated (elongation of leaves / stems) than leaves in the canopy to better collect sunlight in a shaded environment. This caused me to dig into the literature of plant plasticity. Surprisingly, carnivorous plants of the North American genus Sarracenia is at the center of this research. Just like how amphibians are often used to describe plasticity because of their "two-life" strategy, so are carnivorous plants. Sarracenia compensates for living in N poor soils by trapping inverts, however these plants still need and use their modified leaves (hoods) for photosynthesis. 

    Ellison et al. 2004 found morphological differences in Sarracenia purpurea across their range, specifically hood thickness, wing size, size of pitcher opening, and hood length. This is obviously interpreted as adaptive responses to different environmental conditions across this species' range. These differences are largely explained by soil nutrient availability where nutrient rich sites create larger winged hoods better for photosynthesis and cooler temps have thicker walled hoods to prevent frost damage. 

    However, Bott et al. 2008 tested plasticity of this species by conducting a reciprocal transplant experiment where they moved species from more nutrient poor sites to nutrient rich and visa versa. This experiment lasted for two years, showing short term morphological changes. Leaf length, pitcher aperture (how narrow the hood is), and wing width changed in each plant to match the native conspecifics in the habitat they were transplanted to. These morphological changes are consistent with previous findings that larger pitcher aperture aids in prey capture within more nutrient poor sites and wider wings in nutrient rich environments aid in better photosynthesis. This offers evidence that a long lived perennial like the purple pitcher plant can adapt year to year by optimizing pitcher leaf structure to best take advantage of the environment it is in.

Plants are cool.



Bott, T., Meyer, G.A., Young, E.B., 2008. Nutrient limitation and morphological plasticity of the carnivorous pitcher plantSarracenia purpureain contrasting wetland environments. New Phytologist 180, 631–641.. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02575.x

Ellison AM, Buckley HL, Miller TE, Gotelli NJ. Morphological variation in Sarracenia purpurea (Sarraceniaceae): Geographic, environmental, and taxonomic correlates American Journal of Botany. 2004 Nov;91(11):1930-1935. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.91.11.193


Comments

  1. AdamMarch 27, 2021 at 12:10 PM

    Cool post. I never thought of plants in terms of plasticity. As I was reading I struggled to understand the pitcher aperture plasticity. If insects are a source of nutrients like nitrogen, wouldn't it make sense for them to always grow a large aperture regardless of environment? Or is there a tradeoff energetically/fitness-wise with having a large opening versus a small opening? If they invest more towards forming a large opening I could see how this type of change would be necessary to adapt to the environment. Enlighten me!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are ecotoxicologists going to the dogs? No...but they should.

A few months ago I read an article about the Miami Heat basketball organization using Covid sniffing dogs to admit fans into the arena and was blown away. They can't actually detect the virus, but they can pick up the chemical differences in the composition of breaths exhaled between healthy and infected individuals (Dorman 2021). I've always heard about dogs being used to detect drugs and track fugitives, but the ability to detect a virus by sniffing a person's breath is just on a whole other level. I started thinking about possible applications and the idea of using dogs to detect pollutants in the environment came across my mind.  While researching the capabilities of these sniffing dogs, I searched for any examples or projects that involved using sniffing dogs as pollutant detectors and I came across an EPA proof of concept from 2003. The idea was to train sniffing dogs to be able to detect various environmental contaminants that range from house molds to illegal pestic...
4 comments
Read more

I got 99 problems but a bee ain't one: how does host condition affect parasite development?

Over the course of the past few weeks I've been fascinated by extreme life cycles and had planned on writing about the development of organisms that possessed some of those life cycles. I stumbled upon a few examples of parasites that had complex multi-host lifecycles which perked my interest and also was something we hadn't dwelled on in class. We've touched briefly on in utero development which I suppose is somewhat like a parasite developing in a host, but parasite development hasn't been covered. Furthermore, is parasite development subject to similar environmental stressors as the ones we've discussed?  In a paper (cited below) by Logan A. et al., the authors want to know if pollen starvation (low food abundance) in hosts can alter parasite abundance in hosts.  The researchers did an experiment involving  Crithidia bombi (gut parasite) in bumble bees. In this experiment, the researchers were curious about how pollen starvation effects parasite abundance in host...
2 comments
Read more

A discussion of compensatory growth and how it could play a role in captive rearing strategies

One aspect of plasticity that interests me is the idea of compensatory growth (CG). CG is when limitation in resources restricts something like a tadpole from growing at an early stage, but then later, a release in that restriction results in an accelerated growth rate above the average in a population. Observationally, this may just look like less fit tadpoles. Bigger is always better, right?   Maybe not. Consider an extreme example, where a large spider has caught two types of prey on its web, a fruit fly, and a housefly. Now suppose the spider can only pick one prey (perhaps they're only loosely caught on the web and there's a short window of opportunity). Which will the large spider most likely go for? It will probably choose the larger housefly.  Similarly, think of two tadpoles. This time they're the same species, but one is larger than the other. A giant ambushing Anax larva also lives in this pond and it's hungry. But it will give away its position when it attac...
2 comments
Read more