Skip to main content

The Need for More Research in How Microplastics Affect Crab Species


I have always found the topic of plastics in our oceans fascinating due to how destructive they can be individual organisms, a whole species, and the entire ecosystem. Plastics are not just a problem due certain marine animals eating them and dying or because of animals becoming entangled in them, but they also break down further into microplastics. 80 to 85% of marine pollution is caused by plastics, and these plastics breakdown into microplastics by UV light (Auta et. al, 2017). 

These plastics are also easier to consume due to their small size making them a threat to most marine biota, and consuming these plastics has led to problems with reproduction and growth rate (Auta et. al, 2017). However, I wanted to zone in crustaceans (crabs to be more specific) since many species will spend their time both as marine and terrestrial which means they are exposed to microplastics in the water and microplastic that may be found in sediment.

European green crabs have been found to not only consume microplastics, but microplastics will also get trapped in their gills as they breathe. These microplastics can persist in their gills for up to 21 days and in their muscles for up to 14 days (Beckett et. al, 2014). Mud crabs have been found to take in more microplastics and store them in their tissues than the filter feeder, eastern oyster (Donnelly et. al, 2018).  Fiddler crabs were also found to have microplastics in their gills, stomach, and hepatopancreas which shows that microplastics can go to other organs (Appel et. al, 2015). These are just a few examples of crabs that are being affected by microplastics; however, I could have listed even more. There are a multitude of papers that look into microplastics in crab species, but it would be way too many for me to list. It seems that most crab species are taking in these microplastics.

Most of the research that I could find pertaining to crabs and microplastics was if crabs had the presence of microplastic in their tissues, but it does not seem like much work has been done pertaining to how these microplastics affect a crab’s function and their development. I was able to find that crabs who have breathed in microplastics have been found to have trouble taking in oxygen, and these affects would last for at least 16 hours (Galloway et.al, 2016), and that female mole crab had an increase in mortality and decrease in retention of egg clutches (Granek et.al, 2019). 

I believe that more research needs to be done on the effects that microplastics have on different crab species. The two papers I mentioned above only looked at mole crabs and green crabs, but I don’t feel like we can apply those findings in these papers to all crabs even though I do believe that it shows that these studies are warranted for other species. With the amount of studies showing that a lot of crab species are consuming and breathing in microplastics, I hope that this urges researchers to find out more about the effects such as whether it can be transferred to their larvae, how does it affect certain organ functions, does it have an effect on development, etc. I want to believe that these microplastics do have an effect on all the problems that I mentioned, but I can’t be sure until research is done.

I also believe that it is also important to look into how these microplastics are moving from the crabs to their predators. In many papers that I have read, most of the time microplastics are transferred from prey to predator when the predator consumes them, but there are few studies where this is not the case. This is important since so many species eat crabs. Everything from birds to fish to humans and even other crabs consume crabs, and these other species may now be vulnerable to microplastics.

Overall, I believe that more work should be done to look at microplastics. They are abundant, and they have even been found in arctic regions where there is very little to no human activity (Auta et. al, 2017). The amount of these microplastics keep growing as well, and they may have even more severe impacts on certain marine species than we thought they would. Understanding microplastics and how they affect different organisms will help us get a better grasp of how to deal with microplastic and fully realize the threat that they are.

 

Citations:

Appel, D., Brennecke, D., Costa, T.M.M., Ferreira, E.C., Gama, B.A.P., and Lenz, M.

(2015). Ingested microplastics (>100um) are tranlocated to organs of the tropical fiddler crab Uca rapax. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 96(1-2). 491-495.

Auta, H.S., Emenike, C.U., and Fauziah, S.H. (2017). Distribution and importance of

microplastics in the marine environment: A review of the sources, fate, effects, and potential solutions. Environment International. 102, 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.013.

Beckett, S.J., Galloway, T.S., Goodhead, R.M., Lewis, C., Moger, J., Tyler, C.R., and

Watts, A.J.R. (2014). Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by Shore Crab

Carcinus maenas. Environmental Science and Technology. 48(15). 8823-8830.

Donnelly, M.J., Waite, H.R., and Walters, L.J. (2018). Quantity and types of

microplastics in the organic tissues of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica and the Atlantic mud crab Panopeus herbstii from a Florida estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 129(1). 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.02.026

Galloway, T.S., Goodhead, R., Lewis, C., Moger, J., Urbina, M.A., and Watts, A.J.R.

(2016). Effect of Microplastics on the Gills of the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas. Environmental Science and Technology. 50(10). 5364-5369.

Granek, E.F., Horn, D.A., and Steele, C.L. (2019). Effects of environmentally relevant

    concentration of microplastic fiber on Pacific mole crab (Emerita analoga) mortality and

    reproduction.

Comments

  1. Wow, I've been aware of plastic and microplastic pollution in aquatic ecosystems but the fact that they have built up so much in some of the crab species you discussed, and may have effects we haven't explored yet is terrifying. I had always thought about filter feeders being the most at risk for accumulation of microplastics, but as you've said, crustacean are exposed just by eating and breathing. You talked a little bit about the biomagnification of microplastics through trophic levels - I wonder how prevalent this is for microplastics, as you mentioned that some do not magnify. Do you think it is comparable to other toxins, or hopefully less able to accumulate in higher trophic levels that places humans in danger as well?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Environmental Trade-offs of Increased Antidepressant Use

       I came across an interesting sentiment the other day. In response to the generational expression  “kids have it so easy nowadays” someone replied “that’s the point”. The point of progressing is to make life easier for the next generation. While today’s kids don’t have to walk uphill both ways to get to school, they face their own unique obstacles with the constant pressures from social media and threat of school shootings. The 2021 State Of Mental Health In America survey reports that youth depression is worsening. Statistics show that this disproportionately affects youths who identify as more than one race. However, some statistical growth can be attributed to an increase in diagnoses as the stigma of mental health has changed and more people seek treatment. Along with better access to therapy, access to a variety of antidepressants has increased as well. The CDC reports that from 1999 to 2014 antidepressant use has increased by almost 65% with one in...

Change is good...just ask a baby turtle

  Change is good, or so the old adage goes. But is that really true, or is it something said to create a silver lining when the world seems to be shifting at an uncomfortable pace. Not all change is good (just ask the climate), but for some creatures, a little variance can go a long way. Take, for example, the common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ). A recent study by Leivesley and Rollinson (2021) found that mimicking natural temperature fluctuations in incubating eggs had a beneficial effect in early-age immune response. The authors were interested in using immune response as a marker of fitness under the Charnov-Bull model. Their experimental design included four groups: a male promoting temperature (MPT; 24⁰ C) and a female promoting temperature (FPT; 28⁰ C), each split into constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Half of the eggs in each group were treated with an aromatase inhibitor, which effectively prevents female development even at the FPT. The idea is that ...

The Fate of the Honey Bee

   There is often chatter about the need to protect whatever charismatic species has recently been marketed into public attention, and if lucky public concern. Often characterized as charismatic megafauna, species like the bengal tiger, the giant panda, or the humpback whale are flagship species of conservation programs. These species garner affection and concern so successfully that they introduce a degree of taxonomic bias in environmental protection. On the other hand, there are species that have been branded “uninteresting, strange, or ugly” making them uniquely difficult to protect (Purdue. 2016).        In the age of social media, charismatic species have been given a new platform. In the case of the honey bee, you might say the conversation is abuzz. Since 2007, Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) has become a serious source of concern and discourse (Bee-Health. 2019). And I often wonder, how did this species, being so taxonomically different from it’s ch...