Skip to main content

Myth turned material: Human-monkey chimeric embryos

In Greek Mythology, a chimera is a hybrid monster of a lion, serpent and goat. Less menacingly, a genetic chimera is an organism or embryo that contains two distinct sets of DNA, most likely from a combination of different fertilized zygotes. 

Genetic chimeras are distinctly different from hybrids (which contain genetically identical cells resulting from the cross of two different species) and genetic mosaics (which contain genetically different cells from a single zygote). Interestingly, a paper published in April of this year saw the successful creation of human-primate chimera embryos. Mammal chimeras have been created in lab settings for many years now, but this novel primate chimera was allowed through recent technological developments. For the first time, a primate embryo could be kept alive outside of the body for a much longer period. 

Six days after the creation of primate embryos, each was injected with 25 human cells from an induced pluripotent cell line. Of the original 132 chimera embryos created, survival rapidly declined, and only three remained by day 19. Despite this, the count of human cells in each embryo remained high throughout the course of the experiment, which has left many hopeful for future experiments. 

Someday, many hope that these cells could be used to experimentally model human development and disease while avoiding the ethical constraints of human research. However, there are still ethical concerns regarding the creation of human/non-human primate chimeras. 

Despite caveats, the chimera system could represent a breakthrough for the field of human development and infectious disease. With Covid-19 still a pressing global issue, many may be more perceptive to the use of human chimera cells to model disease as a prevention method for future outbreaks as well as for the experimental testing of vaccinations. 

Obviously, there is still a long way to go to ensure that chimera embryos can remain viable for a long enough period to allow for experimental use. Do you think this is a feasible option for future research in human developmental biology? 



Sources 

Cell Press. (2021, April 15). Scientists generate human-monkey chimeric embryos. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 18, 2021 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/04/210415142904.htm

Chimera. (n.d.). Retrieved April 19, 2021, from https://www.britannica.com/science/chimera-genetics

Tan et al. Chimeric contribution of human extended pluripotent stem cells to monkey embryos ex vivo. Cell, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.020


Comments

  1. miredelkindApril 23, 2021 at 12:56 PM

    I wonder about the ethics of this scientific feat. Growing a single organ is one thing-- although I'm not sure if that's possible-- but seeing an entire individual for use as an organ farm seems questionable. Ethically, chimps already are so human like that I wonder if someone could actually. bring themselves to let these individuals fully develop. Although I think this is a really interesting topic, I don't think society would allow this to come to fruition.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Josiah JohnsonApril 25, 2021 at 6:38 PM

    I agree with @miredelkind that it is highly unlikely that any of these individuals would be allowed to fully develop if that even becomes scientifically possible. The question still remains then of how much development is ethically acceptable (probably not far, given that even at the embryo stage this is already an ethically gray area). We already use human cell lines, so I think there is a possibility this could become acceptable in those early stages.

    I am also curious as to what the research implications for human development would be. I see the point in creating such hybrids to more closely model human systems, which would be huge for disease research, but in terms of development having such a hybrid could muddle things greatly. Could a hybrid accurately model human development, or would it dictate an altered developmental scheme to accommodate both halves? The interaction between the two cell lines creates a novel mini-ecosystem with unknown implications. It is a very interesting line of research and obviously still in its infancy, so I will be curious as to how this reaches fruition (provided it is not a Planet of the Apes scenario).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Change is good...just ask a baby turtle

  Change is good, or so the old adage goes. But is that really true, or is it something said to create a silver lining when the world seems to be shifting at an uncomfortable pace. Not all change is good (just ask the climate), but for some creatures, a little variance can go a long way. Take, for example, the common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ). A recent study by Leivesley and Rollinson (2021) found that mimicking natural temperature fluctuations in incubating eggs had a beneficial effect in early-age immune response. The authors were interested in using immune response as a marker of fitness under the Charnov-Bull model. Their experimental design included four groups: a male promoting temperature (MPT; 24⁰ C) and a female promoting temperature (FPT; 28⁰ C), each split into constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Half of the eggs in each group were treated with an aromatase inhibitor, which effectively prevents female development even at the FPT. The idea is that if i
2 comments
Read more

The Dark Side of Subsidies: PCB Transport in Riparian Food Webs

           A common theme in this course has been the discussion of different contaminants and how they enter and persist in natural systems. Identifying the levels at which these contaminants are entering the food web and their method of transport are crucial to assessing their risk. As we discussed this topic in class I was reminded of a paper I read during my Freshwater Ecosystems course and am very glad I went back and re-read it. Published in Ecological Applications, the authors Walters et. al demonstrated how PCB's are transported from aquatic systems into terrestrial food webs through the capture and consumption of aquatic insects by Spiders  and Herps. I thought this particularly appropriate for our classes interests.      One of the largest challenges in a study like this is to determine where the selected predators are obtaining most of their food from. To do this, the authors used a stable isotope analysis to identify the Carbon-13 and Nitrogen-15 ratios in both aquatic
3 comments
Read more

Are ecotoxicologists going to the dogs? No...but they should.

A few months ago I read an article about the Miami Heat basketball organization using Covid sniffing dogs to admit fans into the arena and was blown away. They can't actually detect the virus, but they can pick up the chemical differences in the composition of breaths exhaled between healthy and infected individuals (Dorman 2021). I've always heard about dogs being used to detect drugs and track fugitives, but the ability to detect a virus by sniffing a person's breath is just on a whole other level. I started thinking about possible applications and the idea of using dogs to detect pollutants in the environment came across my mind.  While researching the capabilities of these sniffing dogs, I searched for any examples or projects that involved using sniffing dogs as pollutant detectors and I came across an EPA proof of concept from 2003. The idea was to train sniffing dogs to be able to detect various environmental contaminants that range from house molds to illegal pestic
4 comments
Read more