Skip to main content

Myth turned material: Human-monkey chimeric embryos

In Greek Mythology, a chimera is a hybrid monster of a lion, serpent and goat. Less menacingly, a genetic chimera is an organism or embryo that contains two distinct sets of DNA, most likely from a combination of different fertilized zygotes. 

Genetic chimeras are distinctly different from hybrids (which contain genetically identical cells resulting from the cross of two different species) and genetic mosaics (which contain genetically different cells from a single zygote). Interestingly, a paper published in April of this year saw the successful creation of human-primate chimera embryos. Mammal chimeras have been created in lab settings for many years now, but this novel primate chimera was allowed through recent technological developments. For the first time, a primate embryo could be kept alive outside of the body for a much longer period. 

Six days after the creation of primate embryos, each was injected with 25 human cells from an induced pluripotent cell line. Of the original 132 chimera embryos created, survival rapidly declined, and only three remained by day 19. Despite this, the count of human cells in each embryo remained high throughout the course of the experiment, which has left many hopeful for future experiments. 

Someday, many hope that these cells could be used to experimentally model human development and disease while avoiding the ethical constraints of human research. However, there are still ethical concerns regarding the creation of human/non-human primate chimeras. 

Despite caveats, the chimera system could represent a breakthrough for the field of human development and infectious disease. With Covid-19 still a pressing global issue, many may be more perceptive to the use of human chimera cells to model disease as a prevention method for future outbreaks as well as for the experimental testing of vaccinations. 

Obviously, there is still a long way to go to ensure that chimera embryos can remain viable for a long enough period to allow for experimental use. Do you think this is a feasible option for future research in human developmental biology? 



Sources 

Cell Press. (2021, April 15). Scientists generate human-monkey chimeric embryos. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 18, 2021 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/04/210415142904.htm

Chimera. (n.d.). Retrieved April 19, 2021, from https://www.britannica.com/science/chimera-genetics

Tan et al. Chimeric contribution of human extended pluripotent stem cells to monkey embryos ex vivo. Cell, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.020


Comments

  1. miredelkindApril 23, 2021 at 12:56 PM

    I wonder about the ethics of this scientific feat. Growing a single organ is one thing-- although I'm not sure if that's possible-- but seeing an entire individual for use as an organ farm seems questionable. Ethically, chimps already are so human like that I wonder if someone could actually. bring themselves to let these individuals fully develop. Although I think this is a really interesting topic, I don't think society would allow this to come to fruition.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Josiah JohnsonApril 25, 2021 at 6:38 PM

    I agree with @miredelkind that it is highly unlikely that any of these individuals would be allowed to fully develop if that even becomes scientifically possible. The question still remains then of how much development is ethically acceptable (probably not far, given that even at the embryo stage this is already an ethically gray area). We already use human cell lines, so I think there is a possibility this could become acceptable in those early stages.

    I am also curious as to what the research implications for human development would be. I see the point in creating such hybrids to more closely model human systems, which would be huge for disease research, but in terms of development having such a hybrid could muddle things greatly. Could a hybrid accurately model human development, or would it dictate an altered developmental scheme to accommodate both halves? The interaction between the two cell lines creates a novel mini-ecosystem with unknown implications. It is a very interesting line of research and obviously still in its infancy, so I will be curious as to how this reaches fruition (provided it is not a Planet of the Apes scenario).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Environmental Trade-offs of Increased Antidepressant Use

       I came across an interesting sentiment the other day. In response to the generational expression  “kids have it so easy nowadays” someone replied “that’s the point”. The point of progressing is to make life easier for the next generation. While today’s kids don’t have to walk uphill both ways to get to school, they face their own unique obstacles with the constant pressures from social media and threat of school shootings. The 2021 State Of Mental Health In America survey reports that youth depression is worsening. Statistics show that this disproportionately affects youths who identify as more than one race. However, some statistical growth can be attributed to an increase in diagnoses as the stigma of mental health has changed and more people seek treatment. Along with better access to therapy, access to a variety of antidepressants has increased as well. The CDC reports that from 1999 to 2014 antidepressant use has increased by almost 65% with one in...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Fate of the Honey Bee

   There is often chatter about the need to protect whatever charismatic species has recently been marketed into public attention, and if lucky public concern. Often characterized as charismatic megafauna, species like the bengal tiger, the giant panda, or the humpback whale are flagship species of conservation programs. These species garner affection and concern so successfully that they introduce a degree of taxonomic bias in environmental protection. On the other hand, there are species that have been branded “uninteresting, strange, or ugly” making them uniquely difficult to protect (Purdue. 2016).        In the age of social media, charismatic species have been given a new platform. In the case of the honey bee, you might say the conversation is abuzz. Since 2007, Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) has become a serious source of concern and discourse (Bee-Health. 2019). And I often wonder, how did this species, being so taxonomically different from it’s ch...
1 comment
Read more

Change is good...just ask a baby turtle

  Change is good, or so the old adage goes. But is that really true, or is it something said to create a silver lining when the world seems to be shifting at an uncomfortable pace. Not all change is good (just ask the climate), but for some creatures, a little variance can go a long way. Take, for example, the common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ). A recent study by Leivesley and Rollinson (2021) found that mimicking natural temperature fluctuations in incubating eggs had a beneficial effect in early-age immune response. The authors were interested in using immune response as a marker of fitness under the Charnov-Bull model. Their experimental design included four groups: a male promoting temperature (MPT; 24⁰ C) and a female promoting temperature (FPT; 28⁰ C), each split into constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Half of the eggs in each group were treated with an aromatase inhibitor, which effectively prevents female development even at the FPT. The idea is that ...
2 comments
Read more