Skip to main content

Technology Takeover- are Virtual Animals the New Experimental Standard?

 Biologists at Plymouth university have been working in conjunction with pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca to examine the effectiveness of new 'virtual-fish' as model organisms. It is hoped that the cultured 'fish' could help test for toxicity and concentration of manmade chemicals. 

This heading caught my eye, especially since many of the papers read in our course relied on live amphibians or other organisms to examine the impacts of pollution, bioaccumulation, or (with less mortality) factors like the impacts of clutch density. Model organisms are a crucial aspect of applicable research- they allow us to generalize results across species and develop baselines for testing. They also mature quickly, which is beneficial for timely research. Could this all be changing? 

The university has developed a method for removing cells from the liver of rainbow trout, and manipulating them into a 3-dimensional spheroid, which behaves much like natural animal tissue. These cell spheres are more reactive and more reflective of entire organisms than typical experimental cells grown in lab settings. They have many basic biochemical processes- including the ability to metabolize the surrounding environment. This may be able to give researchers a better idea of how toxic chemicals  impact an organism- without having to subject the animal to said chemical. There is a plan in motion to progress the development of the cell, coaxing it to form gills and a gut system. 

In 2011, 59,000 live fish were subjected to ecotoxicology experiments in the UK alone, and increasing government regulation could demand the testing of more and more contaminants in the coming years- exponentially increasing the need for model organisms. Not only could cells from just a few fish generate a multitude of testable spheroids, but the spheres last significantly longer than other cultivated cells. This means that far fewer fish will be used for testing, and the ones that donate cells will still not be directly subjected to any toxicant treatments. 

This is an interesting first look at what the future of ecological and biological research entails. Personally, I feel that a move away from experimental animals may make results and research itself more appealing to a general audience- especially those who voice ethical objections to the use of live organisms. There could also be potential implications for ecotoxicology specifically. What comes to mind is the almost infinite combinations of different pharmaceutical, agricultural and industrial pollutants that have additive effects when combined in the environment. Using traditional methods, time simply would not allow the close examination of the multitude of developmental and ecological impacts caused by each subset of contaminants. If development of realistic spheroid test subjects is rapid and effective, it may expand the range of possible research, allowing us to grasp a better idea of the environmental implications. 


Citations

“Alternatives: Virtual Fish.” University of Plymouth, www.plymouth.ac.uk/research/animals/alternatives-virtual-fish.

Comments

  1. Trevor UnderwoodMarch 26, 2021 at 5:07 PM

    That's incredible. My mind went to papers we read in class as well, particularly the killifish papers. The fact that these spheroids can perform some biologic processes on top of being responsive is mind-blowing. For ecotoxicology purposes this is definitely the future. Do you think that these spheroid can exhibit some behavioral responses (i.e., non-cognitive behavioral responses)? I love your point that this shift could make research more appealing to everyone. I haven't thought about how the methods of the study weigh on the reader, regardless of how amazing the results are.

    ReplyDelete
  2. August AndersonMarch 30, 2021 at 5:23 PM

    This is a really exciting peek into what the future of EcoDevo. Moving past the ethical issues of animal experimentation and manipulation will make the research much more accessible and will likely expand access to funding as well. One thing that worries me is the concern for ascertaining a realistic reaction norm from experiments involving these spheroids - do you think they'll be able to produce reactions to chemical stressors that can be comparable to what we see in nature? We talked a lot in class about trying to establish laboratory conditions that emulate the realism of nature as much as possible, and while this may move further away from it, it opens up so many more interesting questions about what is possible in the field of ecotoxicological experimentation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Environmental Trade-offs of Increased Antidepressant Use

       I came across an interesting sentiment the other day. In response to the generational expression  “kids have it so easy nowadays” someone replied “that’s the point”. The point of progressing is to make life easier for the next generation. While today’s kids don’t have to walk uphill both ways to get to school, they face their own unique obstacles with the constant pressures from social media and threat of school shootings. The 2021 State Of Mental Health In America survey reports that youth depression is worsening. Statistics show that this disproportionately affects youths who identify as more than one race. However, some statistical growth can be attributed to an increase in diagnoses as the stigma of mental health has changed and more people seek treatment. Along with better access to therapy, access to a variety of antidepressants has increased as well. The CDC reports that from 1999 to 2014 antidepressant use has increased by almost 65% with one in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Change is good...just ask a baby turtle

  Change is good, or so the old adage goes. But is that really true, or is it something said to create a silver lining when the world seems to be shifting at an uncomfortable pace. Not all change is good (just ask the climate), but for some creatures, a little variance can go a long way. Take, for example, the common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ). A recent study by Leivesley and Rollinson (2021) found that mimicking natural temperature fluctuations in incubating eggs had a beneficial effect in early-age immune response. The authors were interested in using immune response as a marker of fitness under the Charnov-Bull model. Their experimental design included four groups: a male promoting temperature (MPT; 24⁰ C) and a female promoting temperature (FPT; 28⁰ C), each split into constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Half of the eggs in each group were treated with an aromatase inhibitor, which effectively prevents female development even at the FPT. The idea is that ...
2 comments
Read more

The Fate of the Honey Bee

   There is often chatter about the need to protect whatever charismatic species has recently been marketed into public attention, and if lucky public concern. Often characterized as charismatic megafauna, species like the bengal tiger, the giant panda, or the humpback whale are flagship species of conservation programs. These species garner affection and concern so successfully that they introduce a degree of taxonomic bias in environmental protection. On the other hand, there are species that have been branded “uninteresting, strange, or ugly” making them uniquely difficult to protect (Purdue. 2016).        In the age of social media, charismatic species have been given a new platform. In the case of the honey bee, you might say the conversation is abuzz. Since 2007, Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) has become a serious source of concern and discourse (Bee-Health. 2019). And I often wonder, how did this species, being so taxonomically different from it’s ch...
1 comment
Read more