Skip to main content

Technology Takeover- are Virtual Animals the New Experimental Standard?

 Biologists at Plymouth university have been working in conjunction with pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca to examine the effectiveness of new 'virtual-fish' as model organisms. It is hoped that the cultured 'fish' could help test for toxicity and concentration of manmade chemicals. 

This heading caught my eye, especially since many of the papers read in our course relied on live amphibians or other organisms to examine the impacts of pollution, bioaccumulation, or (with less mortality) factors like the impacts of clutch density. Model organisms are a crucial aspect of applicable research- they allow us to generalize results across species and develop baselines for testing. They also mature quickly, which is beneficial for timely research. Could this all be changing? 

The university has developed a method for removing cells from the liver of rainbow trout, and manipulating them into a 3-dimensional spheroid, which behaves much like natural animal tissue. These cell spheres are more reactive and more reflective of entire organisms than typical experimental cells grown in lab settings. They have many basic biochemical processes- including the ability to metabolize the surrounding environment. This may be able to give researchers a better idea of how toxic chemicals  impact an organism- without having to subject the animal to said chemical. There is a plan in motion to progress the development of the cell, coaxing it to form gills and a gut system. 

In 2011, 59,000 live fish were subjected to ecotoxicology experiments in the UK alone, and increasing government regulation could demand the testing of more and more contaminants in the coming years- exponentially increasing the need for model organisms. Not only could cells from just a few fish generate a multitude of testable spheroids, but the spheres last significantly longer than other cultivated cells. This means that far fewer fish will be used for testing, and the ones that donate cells will still not be directly subjected to any toxicant treatments. 

This is an interesting first look at what the future of ecological and biological research entails. Personally, I feel that a move away from experimental animals may make results and research itself more appealing to a general audience- especially those who voice ethical objections to the use of live organisms. There could also be potential implications for ecotoxicology specifically. What comes to mind is the almost infinite combinations of different pharmaceutical, agricultural and industrial pollutants that have additive effects when combined in the environment. Using traditional methods, time simply would not allow the close examination of the multitude of developmental and ecological impacts caused by each subset of contaminants. If development of realistic spheroid test subjects is rapid and effective, it may expand the range of possible research, allowing us to grasp a better idea of the environmental implications. 


Citations

“Alternatives: Virtual Fish.” University of Plymouth, www.plymouth.ac.uk/research/animals/alternatives-virtual-fish.

Comments

  1. Trevor UnderwoodMarch 26, 2021 at 5:07 PM

    That's incredible. My mind went to papers we read in class as well, particularly the killifish papers. The fact that these spheroids can perform some biologic processes on top of being responsive is mind-blowing. For ecotoxicology purposes this is definitely the future. Do you think that these spheroid can exhibit some behavioral responses (i.e., non-cognitive behavioral responses)? I love your point that this shift could make research more appealing to everyone. I haven't thought about how the methods of the study weigh on the reader, regardless of how amazing the results are.

    ReplyDelete
  2. August AndersonMarch 30, 2021 at 5:23 PM

    This is a really exciting peek into what the future of EcoDevo. Moving past the ethical issues of animal experimentation and manipulation will make the research much more accessible and will likely expand access to funding as well. One thing that worries me is the concern for ascertaining a realistic reaction norm from experiments involving these spheroids - do you think they'll be able to produce reactions to chemical stressors that can be comparable to what we see in nature? We talked a lot in class about trying to establish laboratory conditions that emulate the realism of nature as much as possible, and while this may move further away from it, it opens up so many more interesting questions about what is possible in the field of ecotoxicological experimentation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Change is good...just ask a baby turtle

  Change is good, or so the old adage goes. But is that really true, or is it something said to create a silver lining when the world seems to be shifting at an uncomfortable pace. Not all change is good (just ask the climate), but for some creatures, a little variance can go a long way. Take, for example, the common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ). A recent study by Leivesley and Rollinson (2021) found that mimicking natural temperature fluctuations in incubating eggs had a beneficial effect in early-age immune response. The authors were interested in using immune response as a marker of fitness under the Charnov-Bull model. Their experimental design included four groups: a male promoting temperature (MPT; 24⁰ C) and a female promoting temperature (FPT; 28⁰ C), each split into constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Half of the eggs in each group were treated with an aromatase inhibitor, which effectively prevents female development even at the FPT. The idea is that if i
2 comments
Read more

The Dark Side of Subsidies: PCB Transport in Riparian Food Webs

           A common theme in this course has been the discussion of different contaminants and how they enter and persist in natural systems. Identifying the levels at which these contaminants are entering the food web and their method of transport are crucial to assessing their risk. As we discussed this topic in class I was reminded of a paper I read during my Freshwater Ecosystems course and am very glad I went back and re-read it. Published in Ecological Applications, the authors Walters et. al demonstrated how PCB's are transported from aquatic systems into terrestrial food webs through the capture and consumption of aquatic insects by Spiders  and Herps. I thought this particularly appropriate for our classes interests.      One of the largest challenges in a study like this is to determine where the selected predators are obtaining most of their food from. To do this, the authors used a stable isotope analysis to identify the Carbon-13 and Nitrogen-15 ratios in both aquatic
3 comments
Read more

Are ecotoxicologists going to the dogs? No...but they should.

A few months ago I read an article about the Miami Heat basketball organization using Covid sniffing dogs to admit fans into the arena and was blown away. They can't actually detect the virus, but they can pick up the chemical differences in the composition of breaths exhaled between healthy and infected individuals (Dorman 2021). I've always heard about dogs being used to detect drugs and track fugitives, but the ability to detect a virus by sniffing a person's breath is just on a whole other level. I started thinking about possible applications and the idea of using dogs to detect pollutants in the environment came across my mind.  While researching the capabilities of these sniffing dogs, I searched for any examples or projects that involved using sniffing dogs as pollutant detectors and I came across an EPA proof of concept from 2003. The idea was to train sniffing dogs to be able to detect various environmental contaminants that range from house molds to illegal pestic
4 comments
Read more