Skip to main content

Ecodevo, Ecotox, and Disease Ecology- How do we investigate multiple stressors?

Throughout this course, we have frequently discussed how early life conditions can influence an organism later on in life. We have discussed this in a variety of different contexts, but one aspect we haven’t really touched on is disease risk. I have always been interested in how exposure to stressors in formative life stages of development may have enduring health effects. We have discussed how early-life stressors can alter an organism’s behavior later on in life. This altered behavior may have an impact on an organism’s ability to avoid infection, and in turn, increases their infection risk and/or tolerance. This is just one potential mechanism by which early-life exposure to stressors may influence disease risk later on in life.

 

A paper published in 2013 by Jason Rohr and colleagues entitled “Early-life exposure to a herbicide has enduring effects on pathogen-induced mortality” briefly discusses a variety of potential mechanisms by which early-life exposure to stressors may influence disease risk later on in life. The aim of their study was to test whether early-life exposure to a herbicide (atrazine) has immediate and/or long-term effects on Bd-induced mortality in amphibians. I find this paper particularly interesting because they also aimed to identify the mechanisms driving these effects. If you are interested in reading more about this study, I included a citation to the paper below. 

 

There are several studies out there now looking at the impacts of a single environmental stressor on disease risk. Every organism gets sick at some point in their life. Thus, I think disease as a naturally occurring and anthropogenically induced stressor is an important component to research and think about. I find it particularly intriguing to think about questions that arise from the intersection in ecodevo, ecotox, and disease ecology. 

 

I’m interested in understanding not only how a single environmental stressor, but rather multiple stressors interact with one another during development and the impact on carryover effects. We briefly touched on this in class this week, but we all know that amphibians experience multiple stressors during development under natural conditions. Many of these stressors we have discussed in class, yet we haven’t mentioned disease- a very prominent stressor for all organisms. My point being that there is a rather long list of potential stressors that a tadpole is exposed too during development. However, investigating and understanding the mechanisms driving these effects becomes much more complicated with exposure to multiple stressors. Even with unlimited resources, money, and time, it is still impossible to investigate and address all of the stressors one may experience under natural conditions. Looking at the impacts of a single or even two stressors in isolation is a good start, but it’s not the whole picture. I find myself frequently thinking about how we balance the natural conditions with what is logistically feasible. I do not have an answer as to how we should address this dilemma, but I think it is a really important component to consider in the field moving forward. Additionally, many papers I read (and the review we read for class this week by Thambirajah et al. 2019) state that additional studies need to be done examining the impacts of multiple contaminants or contaminant mixtures. I completely agree, however, few people (if any) address how to logistically accomplish this goal. If anyone has any ideas on how to conduct this sort of research, I would love to hear your thoughts and I eagerly welcome you to comment below!

 

Sources:

Rohr, J. R., Raffel, T. R., Halstead, N. T., McMahon, T. A., Johnson, S. A., Boughton, R. K., & Martin, L. B. (2013). Early-life exposure to a herbicide has enduring effects on pathogen-induced mortality. Proceedings. Biological Sciences / The Royal Society, 280(1772), 20131502.

Comments

  1. AdamMarch 27, 2021 at 12:35 PM

    Your post made me think of how invasive species can cause native species to be more susceptible to iridoviruses through stress. Pesticides as well, although they are usually found in the environment at levels that don't kill amphibians, the sublethal stress that they can cause I think is being overlooked, because studies have shown that they can be multipliers for the effects of other stressors like invasion, disease, or other processes that result in extirpation of a species. For example, a study by Rick Relyea in 2003 apparently showed that tree frogs exposed to the chemical carbaryl alone are resistant at certain levels but when the threat of predation is added as a factor to the same amount of carbaryl, the effects of carbaryl are up to 46x more lethal than they would be alone. Makes you think about the way we conduct environmental risk assessments and their potential to be flawed.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Environmental Trade-offs of Increased Antidepressant Use

       I came across an interesting sentiment the other day. In response to the generational expression  “kids have it so easy nowadays” someone replied “that’s the point”. The point of progressing is to make life easier for the next generation. While today’s kids don’t have to walk uphill both ways to get to school, they face their own unique obstacles with the constant pressures from social media and threat of school shootings. The 2021 State Of Mental Health In America survey reports that youth depression is worsening. Statistics show that this disproportionately affects youths who identify as more than one race. However, some statistical growth can be attributed to an increase in diagnoses as the stigma of mental health has changed and more people seek treatment. Along with better access to therapy, access to a variety of antidepressants has increased as well. The CDC reports that from 1999 to 2014 antidepressant use has increased by almost 65% with one in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Change is good...just ask a baby turtle

  Change is good, or so the old adage goes. But is that really true, or is it something said to create a silver lining when the world seems to be shifting at an uncomfortable pace. Not all change is good (just ask the climate), but for some creatures, a little variance can go a long way. Take, for example, the common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ). A recent study by Leivesley and Rollinson (2021) found that mimicking natural temperature fluctuations in incubating eggs had a beneficial effect in early-age immune response. The authors were interested in using immune response as a marker of fitness under the Charnov-Bull model. Their experimental design included four groups: a male promoting temperature (MPT; 24⁰ C) and a female promoting temperature (FPT; 28⁰ C), each split into constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Half of the eggs in each group were treated with an aromatase inhibitor, which effectively prevents female development even at the FPT. The idea is that ...
2 comments
Read more

The Fate of the Honey Bee

   There is often chatter about the need to protect whatever charismatic species has recently been marketed into public attention, and if lucky public concern. Often characterized as charismatic megafauna, species like the bengal tiger, the giant panda, or the humpback whale are flagship species of conservation programs. These species garner affection and concern so successfully that they introduce a degree of taxonomic bias in environmental protection. On the other hand, there are species that have been branded “uninteresting, strange, or ugly” making them uniquely difficult to protect (Purdue. 2016).        In the age of social media, charismatic species have been given a new platform. In the case of the honey bee, you might say the conversation is abuzz. Since 2007, Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) has become a serious source of concern and discourse (Bee-Health. 2019). And I often wonder, how did this species, being so taxonomically different from it’s ch...
1 comment
Read more