Skip to main content

What's driving morphological trait evolution?

My personal motto has pretty much always been to do the thing I’m most afraid of, within reason of course. Following this guideline has opened me up to a world of opportunities and personal growth. So, I decided for this blog post I’d take the same approach and dive into an area that I’m not very comfortable with. For me this area of discomfort is the intersection between large diverse communities and evolution. 

Trophic interactions define our understanding of ecosystem resource cycling and diversity. Understanding the spatial and evolutionary scales at which trophic ecology influences biodiversity of central import to understanding long term macro-evolutionary dynamics.  A 2019 paper, “Reef fish functional traits evolve fastest at trophic extremes”, dives into the impact trophic position exerts on trait evolution in coral reef environments. Coral reefs sit on the upper limit of ecosystems teeming with  biodiversity. That said, they are an excellent setting for trophic studies, such as this.   

Researchers examined three hypotheses regarding the drivers of evolution: the height constraint hypothesis (HCH), the niche variation hypothesis (NVH), and the trophic extremes hypothesis (TEH). Under the HCH, high trophic levels would evolve more slowly than lower trophic levels because of the constraints imposed by high trophic levels feeding on evasive lower tere prey. Alternatively, NVH suggests the existence of a positive relationship between niche breadth and phenotypic variation. If NVH were the true evolutionary driver we would see intermediate trophic levels experiencing the highest rates of trait evolution. TEH, on the other hand, that organisms on the extreme ends of the trophic level, either highly or lowly situated, would experience the highest rates of trait evolution because these groups would have the most difficulty acquiring resources, creating a strong motivator for trait evolution. 

To actually put these hypotheses to the test, the team used previously published trophic level data to create a phylogenetic reconstruction of over 1,500 coral reef species. To measure the rate of trait evolution, researchers used an R package to map the multivariate rate of morphological evolution across trophic levels. Ultimately, this yielded a number of interesting results. Primarily, they observed that top-level predators experienced the fastest rates of most morphological evolution. This automatically rules out the HCH. They also observed that mid-level predators had the slowest rates of morphological evolution, scoring points for the TEH. Herbivores had the quickest rates of ME, while omnivores had the slowest, suggesting against the NVH. 

Given these findings, the TEH best supported the patterns seen, meaning that organisms at trophic extremes, those having the most difficultly with resource acquisition, experienced the highest levels of morphological trait evolution. I feel after reading this article that, like me, species that face the greatest challenges also experience the most growth. 


Citations: 

Borstein, Samuel R.; Fordyce, James A.; O'Meara, Brian C. (2019). Reef fish functional traits evolve fastest at trophic extremes. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION 3, 2. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Are ecotoxicologists going to the dogs? No...but they should.

A few months ago I read an article about the Miami Heat basketball organization using Covid sniffing dogs to admit fans into the arena and was blown away. They can't actually detect the virus, but they can pick up the chemical differences in the composition of breaths exhaled between healthy and infected individuals (Dorman 2021). I've always heard about dogs being used to detect drugs and track fugitives, but the ability to detect a virus by sniffing a person's breath is just on a whole other level. I started thinking about possible applications and the idea of using dogs to detect pollutants in the environment came across my mind.  While researching the capabilities of these sniffing dogs, I searched for any examples or projects that involved using sniffing dogs as pollutant detectors and I came across an EPA proof of concept from 2003. The idea was to train sniffing dogs to be able to detect various environmental contaminants that range from house molds to illegal pestic

The Dark Side of Subsidies: PCB Transport in Riparian Food Webs

           A common theme in this course has been the discussion of different contaminants and how they enter and persist in natural systems. Identifying the levels at which these contaminants are entering the food web and their method of transport are crucial to assessing their risk. As we discussed this topic in class I was reminded of a paper I read during my Freshwater Ecosystems course and am very glad I went back and re-read it. Published in Ecological Applications, the authors Walters et. al demonstrated how PCB's are transported from aquatic systems into terrestrial food webs through the capture and consumption of aquatic insects by Spiders  and Herps. I thought this particularly appropriate for our classes interests.      One of the largest challenges in a study like this is to determine where the selected predators are obtaining most of their food from. To do this, the authors used a stable isotope analysis to identify the Carbon-13 and Nitrogen-15 ratios in both aquatic

Change is good...just ask a baby turtle

  Change is good, or so the old adage goes. But is that really true, or is it something said to create a silver lining when the world seems to be shifting at an uncomfortable pace. Not all change is good (just ask the climate), but for some creatures, a little variance can go a long way. Take, for example, the common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ). A recent study by Leivesley and Rollinson (2021) found that mimicking natural temperature fluctuations in incubating eggs had a beneficial effect in early-age immune response. The authors were interested in using immune response as a marker of fitness under the Charnov-Bull model. Their experimental design included four groups: a male promoting temperature (MPT; 24⁰ C) and a female promoting temperature (FPT; 28⁰ C), each split into constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Half of the eggs in each group were treated with an aromatase inhibitor, which effectively prevents female development even at the FPT. The idea is that if i