Skip to main content

What's driving morphological trait evolution?

My personal motto has pretty much always been to do the thing I’m most afraid of, within reason of course. Following this guideline has opened me up to a world of opportunities and personal growth. So, I decided for this blog post I’d take the same approach and dive into an area that I’m not very comfortable with. For me this area of discomfort is the intersection between large diverse communities and evolution. 

Trophic interactions define our understanding of ecosystem resource cycling and diversity. Understanding the spatial and evolutionary scales at which trophic ecology influences biodiversity of central import to understanding long term macro-evolutionary dynamics.  A 2019 paper, “Reef fish functional traits evolve fastest at trophic extremes”, dives into the impact trophic position exerts on trait evolution in coral reef environments. Coral reefs sit on the upper limit of ecosystems teeming with  biodiversity. That said, they are an excellent setting for trophic studies, such as this.   

Researchers examined three hypotheses regarding the drivers of evolution: the height constraint hypothesis (HCH), the niche variation hypothesis (NVH), and the trophic extremes hypothesis (TEH). Under the HCH, high trophic levels would evolve more slowly than lower trophic levels because of the constraints imposed by high trophic levels feeding on evasive lower tere prey. Alternatively, NVH suggests the existence of a positive relationship between niche breadth and phenotypic variation. If NVH were the true evolutionary driver we would see intermediate trophic levels experiencing the highest rates of trait evolution. TEH, on the other hand, that organisms on the extreme ends of the trophic level, either highly or lowly situated, would experience the highest rates of trait evolution because these groups would have the most difficulty acquiring resources, creating a strong motivator for trait evolution. 

To actually put these hypotheses to the test, the team used previously published trophic level data to create a phylogenetic reconstruction of over 1,500 coral reef species. To measure the rate of trait evolution, researchers used an R package to map the multivariate rate of morphological evolution across trophic levels. Ultimately, this yielded a number of interesting results. Primarily, they observed that top-level predators experienced the fastest rates of most morphological evolution. This automatically rules out the HCH. They also observed that mid-level predators had the slowest rates of morphological evolution, scoring points for the TEH. Herbivores had the quickest rates of ME, while omnivores had the slowest, suggesting against the NVH. 

Given these findings, the TEH best supported the patterns seen, meaning that organisms at trophic extremes, those having the most difficultly with resource acquisition, experienced the highest levels of morphological trait evolution. I feel after reading this article that, like me, species that face the greatest challenges also experience the most growth. 


Citations: 

Borstein, Samuel R.; Fordyce, James A.; O'Meara, Brian C. (2019). Reef fish functional traits evolve fastest at trophic extremes. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION 3, 2. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Environmental Trade-offs of Increased Antidepressant Use

       I came across an interesting sentiment the other day. In response to the generational expression  “kids have it so easy nowadays” someone replied “that’s the point”. The point of progressing is to make life easier for the next generation. While today’s kids don’t have to walk uphill both ways to get to school, they face their own unique obstacles with the constant pressures from social media and threat of school shootings. The 2021 State Of Mental Health In America survey reports that youth depression is worsening. Statistics show that this disproportionately affects youths who identify as more than one race. However, some statistical growth can be attributed to an increase in diagnoses as the stigma of mental health has changed and more people seek treatment. Along with better access to therapy, access to a variety of antidepressants has increased as well. The CDC reports that from 1999 to 2014 antidepressant use has increased by almost 65% with one in...

Change is good...just ask a baby turtle

  Change is good, or so the old adage goes. But is that really true, or is it something said to create a silver lining when the world seems to be shifting at an uncomfortable pace. Not all change is good (just ask the climate), but for some creatures, a little variance can go a long way. Take, for example, the common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ). A recent study by Leivesley and Rollinson (2021) found that mimicking natural temperature fluctuations in incubating eggs had a beneficial effect in early-age immune response. The authors were interested in using immune response as a marker of fitness under the Charnov-Bull model. Their experimental design included four groups: a male promoting temperature (MPT; 24⁰ C) and a female promoting temperature (FPT; 28⁰ C), each split into constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Half of the eggs in each group were treated with an aromatase inhibitor, which effectively prevents female development even at the FPT. The idea is that ...

The Fate of the Honey Bee

   There is often chatter about the need to protect whatever charismatic species has recently been marketed into public attention, and if lucky public concern. Often characterized as charismatic megafauna, species like the bengal tiger, the giant panda, or the humpback whale are flagship species of conservation programs. These species garner affection and concern so successfully that they introduce a degree of taxonomic bias in environmental protection. On the other hand, there are species that have been branded “uninteresting, strange, or ugly” making them uniquely difficult to protect (Purdue. 2016).        In the age of social media, charismatic species have been given a new platform. In the case of the honey bee, you might say the conversation is abuzz. Since 2007, Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) has become a serious source of concern and discourse (Bee-Health. 2019). And I often wonder, how did this species, being so taxonomically different from it’s ch...