Skip to main content

It's The Personality That Counts- Is animal personality related to life-history tradeoffs?

I have a deep personal interest in animal behavior and cognition, so when I came across a research article relating behavioral traits to life-history factors including fecundity and growth, I had to share it. 

Animal personality traits (PTs) vary across individuals, and can be categorized in the same way human behavior is- shyness, boldness, sociability, aggressiveness, activity level, and tendency for exploration. While it is known that individuals vary in their behavior, it's still a bit of a mystery as to why some individuals act consistently different than their local conspecifics. A current hypothesis states that behavioral differences between individuals may be a result of life-history tradeoff differences. 

Given that personality traits (and especially behavior) are somewhat plastic, scientists are also puzzled as to why individual behavior is consistent throughout time. This does not mean that an individual always acts in the same way, but rather that they will always respond similarly to a specific context or stimuli- a response which varies between individuals in the same population. A 2008 study hypothesized that individuals would exhibit similar PTs when their levels of L-H productivity are similar, and when certain PTs are associated with high productivity. For a simple example, if the boldest individuals in a population routinely consume the most food, then individuals with high growth rates should consistently exhibit bold behavior. 

It does make logical sense that differences between individuals' growth and reproduction is likely to be correlated with differences in personality traits- especially those traits related to the acquisition of resources. In class, we have discussed many factors that influence plasticity in growth rates or age at reproduction, but its interesting to approach L-H tradeoffs as both the result and the driver of personality traits in organisms. 

In fishing spiders, house mice, and Atlantic silverside fish, activity level and boldness were correlated with high growth rates and increased fecundity. It makes sense that the two L-H traits are related, since juvenile growth determines adult size, and adult size is positively related with fecundity levels. The fascinating part is the role of behavior in both determining and maintaining these traits. 

Certain individuals have consistently higher growth rates and larger clutch sizes than their counterparts, but how are these traits maintained across time? Obviously there are physiological and genetic factors, but I now believe that there is a complex interaction of the physical and the psychological on organismal productivity. 


Citations

Biro, P. A., & Stamps, J. A. (2008). Are animal personality traits linked to life-history productivity?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(7), 361-368.

Comments

  1. Kiersten NelsonMarch 15, 2021 at 8:14 AM

    It is really interesting to think about how early life history traits influence personality traits later on in life. Additionally, I wonder how environmental or social conditions during early life development could also play a role in influencing personality traits and what are the underlying mechanisms facilitating these effects? We read a paper for class this week by Bentz et al. 2021 (“Prenatal testosterone triggers long-term behavioral changes in male zebra finches: unravelling the neurogenomic mechanism”) that had me thinking about these sort of questions. I think this is a really interesting field and addressing the underlying mechanisms of these effects is a rather new and exciting component.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are ecotoxicologists going to the dogs? No...but they should.

A few months ago I read an article about the Miami Heat basketball organization using Covid sniffing dogs to admit fans into the arena and was blown away. They can't actually detect the virus, but they can pick up the chemical differences in the composition of breaths exhaled between healthy and infected individuals (Dorman 2021). I've always heard about dogs being used to detect drugs and track fugitives, but the ability to detect a virus by sniffing a person's breath is just on a whole other level. I started thinking about possible applications and the idea of using dogs to detect pollutants in the environment came across my mind.  While researching the capabilities of these sniffing dogs, I searched for any examples or projects that involved using sniffing dogs as pollutant detectors and I came across an EPA proof of concept from 2003. The idea was to train sniffing dogs to be able to detect various environmental contaminants that range from house molds to illegal pestic
4 comments
Read more

The Dark Side of Subsidies: PCB Transport in Riparian Food Webs

           A common theme in this course has been the discussion of different contaminants and how they enter and persist in natural systems. Identifying the levels at which these contaminants are entering the food web and their method of transport are crucial to assessing their risk. As we discussed this topic in class I was reminded of a paper I read during my Freshwater Ecosystems course and am very glad I went back and re-read it. Published in Ecological Applications, the authors Walters et. al demonstrated how PCB's are transported from aquatic systems into terrestrial food webs through the capture and consumption of aquatic insects by Spiders  and Herps. I thought this particularly appropriate for our classes interests.      One of the largest challenges in a study like this is to determine where the selected predators are obtaining most of their food from. To do this, the authors used a stable isotope analysis to identify the Carbon-13 and Nitrogen-15 ratios in both aquatic
3 comments
Read more

A discussion of compensatory growth and how it could play a role in captive rearing strategies

One aspect of plasticity that interests me is the idea of compensatory growth (CG). CG is when limitation in resources restricts something like a tadpole from growing at an early stage, but then later, a release in that restriction results in an accelerated growth rate above the average in a population. Observationally, this may just look like less fit tadpoles. Bigger is always better, right?   Maybe not. Consider an extreme example, where a large spider has caught two types of prey on its web, a fruit fly, and a housefly. Now suppose the spider can only pick one prey (perhaps they're only loosely caught on the web and there's a short window of opportunity). Which will the large spider most likely go for? It will probably choose the larger housefly.  Similarly, think of two tadpoles. This time they're the same species, but one is larger than the other. A giant ambushing Anax larva also lives in this pond and it's hungry. But it will give away its position when it attac
2 comments
Read more