Skip to main content

Induced Sex Change in US Fisheries: Drop in the Bucket or Nail in the Coffin?

     Recently in class, we've been examining sex determination and reproductive development. One topic in particular that stuck out to me was the idea of sex change at the adult stage of an organism's life. Such an incredible display of plasticity is very fascinating to me, and I've been thinking about the literature we've taken a look at in class (Matsumoto et al. 2014 & Capel et al. 2017). On one hand, we've seen how exposure to PCB's at the embryonic stage in turtles can redirect gonadal directory (Matsumoto et al. 2014), and on the other hand we learned how adult fish can change sex based on visual and social cues (Capel et al. 2017). Something significant that I feel like we haven't covered but I'm familiar with from past courses is the effect of pollution (PCB's and estrogen in particular) on the endocrine system in fish species. 

    Wastewater treatment runoff into streams wreaks havoc on aquatic species. Chemicals acting as endocrine disruptors alter reproductive characteristics of local species, including creating intersex conditions for fish among a plethora of other sub-lethal effects. Wastewater runoff isn't uncommon in the US; in regions of the Southeast, 70-90% of fish sampled in the Southeast are intersex. Other factors besides wastewater runoff such as runoff from enclosed livestock operations can contribute to increased levels of endocrine disruptors in riverine systems, but sometimes drivers of increased endocrine disruptor levels are not so clear. In a study done by Kellock et al. in 2014, 48% of largemouth bass found in impoundment sites in Georgia were intersex and on average were shorter and smaller than their conspecifics. In this case, a striking proportion of the sampled population was intersex in spite of considerable isolation from human inputs (WWTP's or septic tanks). This is extremely alarming because we don't even know the source of contamination. 

    To add on to the effects of climate change and other issues, this problem also has large implications on fisheries across the country. Affected individuals suffer from decreased fecundity and viability in the face of induced intersex conditions. This further contributes to the decline we see now in fisheries around the world. On the bright side, I think this is an issue that could see improvement because of public interaction with fish of recreational value (i.e., largemouth bass). Once people begin to directly experience the effects of these induced changes to recreational fish populations, it will be easier to gather support for funding more research and developing strategies to mitigate the effects of what we see happening now. What's yet to be seen are the longstanding effects of this issue. How will generations look further down the line? What do wild populations truly look like now? What solutions can we come up with to reduce disruptive inputs? 



Sources:

Matsumoto Y. et al., 2014. Embryonic PCB exposure alters phenotypic, genetic, and epigenetic profiles in turtle sex determination, a biomarker of environmental contamination. Endocrinology 1-11. 

Capel B., 2017. Vertebrate sex determination: evolutionary plasticity of a fundamental switch. Genetics 1-15. 

Kellock K.A. et al., 2014. Survey of Intersex Largemouth Bass from Impoundments in Georgia USA. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 143:565–572. 

https://youtu.be/a1MsWUGkOFE

Comments

  1. Kiersten NelsonMarch 15, 2021 at 8:26 AM

    Wow, this is really interesting. I had no idea that some regions in the southeast 70-90% of fish sampled were intersex. That is a crazy statistic. I would be interested in if these trends we see in the US are the same across other large developed countries or if the US is an exception.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jared BennettMarch 30, 2021 at 8:33 AM

    This is super interesting! Most of my work is with SE fishes and so I am curious as to how I could assess this in the field. Something I have noticed over the last few years is that it is extremely difficult to sex fish in the field (particularly bass and other fish in non-breeding seasons). I think training of fish biologists to be able to collect some measure of data on this while sampling could lead to a really interesting data set, especially when paired with the water parameters that are usually taken while sampling. Cool blog! -Jared

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Dark Side of Subsidies: PCB Transport in Riparian Food Webs

           A common theme in this course has been the discussion of different contaminants and how they enter and persist in natural systems. Identifying the levels at which these contaminants are entering the food web and their method of transport are crucial to assessing their risk. As we discussed this topic in class I was reminded of a paper I read during my Freshwater Ecosystems course and am very glad I went back and re-read it. Published in Ecological Applications, the authors Walters et. al demonstrated how PCB's are transported from aquatic systems into terrestrial food webs through the capture and consumption of aquatic insects by Spiders  and Herps. I thought this particularly appropriate for our classes interests.      One of the largest challenges in a study like this is to determine where the selected predators are obtaining most of their food from. To do this, the authors used a stable isotope analysis to identify the Carbon-13 and Nitrogen-15 ratios in both aquatic
3 comments
Read more

Are ecotoxicologists going to the dogs? No...but they should.

A few months ago I read an article about the Miami Heat basketball organization using Covid sniffing dogs to admit fans into the arena and was blown away. They can't actually detect the virus, but they can pick up the chemical differences in the composition of breaths exhaled between healthy and infected individuals (Dorman 2021). I've always heard about dogs being used to detect drugs and track fugitives, but the ability to detect a virus by sniffing a person's breath is just on a whole other level. I started thinking about possible applications and the idea of using dogs to detect pollutants in the environment came across my mind.  While researching the capabilities of these sniffing dogs, I searched for any examples or projects that involved using sniffing dogs as pollutant detectors and I came across an EPA proof of concept from 2003. The idea was to train sniffing dogs to be able to detect various environmental contaminants that range from house molds to illegal pestic
4 comments
Read more

Change is good...just ask a baby turtle

  Change is good, or so the old adage goes. But is that really true, or is it something said to create a silver lining when the world seems to be shifting at an uncomfortable pace. Not all change is good (just ask the climate), but for some creatures, a little variance can go a long way. Take, for example, the common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ). A recent study by Leivesley and Rollinson (2021) found that mimicking natural temperature fluctuations in incubating eggs had a beneficial effect in early-age immune response. The authors were interested in using immune response as a marker of fitness under the Charnov-Bull model. Their experimental design included four groups: a male promoting temperature (MPT; 24⁰ C) and a female promoting temperature (FPT; 28⁰ C), each split into constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Half of the eggs in each group were treated with an aromatase inhibitor, which effectively prevents female development even at the FPT. The idea is that if i
2 comments
Read more