Skip to main content

Great new literature review on the role of stress hormones in amphibian plasticity

 

    Over the past couple of weeks, we have spent a lot of time focusing on plasticity responses in amphibians to different environmental scenarios, covering everything from pond drying to predatory cues. I recently came across a great literature review that not only covers both of these studies, but also dives into the proximate hormonal mechanisms driving such cases of plasticity in amphibians (the author of the paper, Robert Denver, is actually the same person who did the studies on pond drying and spadefoot toads). The literature review goes through the main hormones of the neuroendocrine stress axis before discussing how these various hormones specifically affect development in amphibian larvae.

    One particular aspect that I found fascinating was the role of corticosterone in predatory response. We have already discussed some of the morphological effects caused by exposure to chemical cues given off by predators in class, but something that we did not discuss was immediate behavioral changes. Detecting a predatory chemical cue causes a response in the hypothalamo-pituitary-interrenal (HPI) neuroendocrine stress axis and a subsequent release of corticosterone. As a result, tadpoles will freeze in place to avoid detection, something referred to as behavioral inhibition. This response is reversed a few hours later as corticosterone levels start to drop. However, if tadpoles are chronically exposed to predators (as they very may well be in wetland environments) then corticosterone levels do not decline but start initiating morphological changes such as increased tail height, changes in tail color, and decreased relative body size that supposedly help them escape from predators. I find it fascinating that the same proximate mechanism (in this case, corticosterone) can enact such different results under different conditions, revealing that plasticity shows up even at the hormonal level. This is just one of the examples that Denver delves into, and I found the paper as a whole to be a great read, so I figured that I would share it here for the rest of the class if you have the time and are interested (see citation and link below).

 

Denver, R.J. 2021. Stress hormones mediate developmental plasticity in vertebrates with complex life cycles. Neurobiology of Stress 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100301

Comments

  1. I find the ability to of the HPI to influence behavior *AND* morphological development also interesting. To think that the HPI might also affect the timing of life history events is another level of effect, too. The pleiotropy of endocrine signaling is something that I end up thinking about a lot in different contexts-- Does endocrine-mediated pleiotropy inhibit or facilitate the evolution of novel, adaptive organismal responses to their environment? I can see it how might work both ways.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also, the HPA (HPI equivalent in humans) affects fight or flight behavior in humans, but I thought this was mediated by catecholamines (epinephrine and norepinephrine) rather than cortisol. Do amphibians have these hormones or does cortisol perform this behavioral function in their stead?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are ecotoxicologists going to the dogs? No...but they should.

A few months ago I read an article about the Miami Heat basketball organization using Covid sniffing dogs to admit fans into the arena and was blown away. They can't actually detect the virus, but they can pick up the chemical differences in the composition of breaths exhaled between healthy and infected individuals (Dorman 2021). I've always heard about dogs being used to detect drugs and track fugitives, but the ability to detect a virus by sniffing a person's breath is just on a whole other level. I started thinking about possible applications and the idea of using dogs to detect pollutants in the environment came across my mind.  While researching the capabilities of these sniffing dogs, I searched for any examples or projects that involved using sniffing dogs as pollutant detectors and I came across an EPA proof of concept from 2003. The idea was to train sniffing dogs to be able to detect various environmental contaminants that range from house molds to illegal pestic

The Dark Side of Subsidies: PCB Transport in Riparian Food Webs

           A common theme in this course has been the discussion of different contaminants and how they enter and persist in natural systems. Identifying the levels at which these contaminants are entering the food web and their method of transport are crucial to assessing their risk. As we discussed this topic in class I was reminded of a paper I read during my Freshwater Ecosystems course and am very glad I went back and re-read it. Published in Ecological Applications, the authors Walters et. al demonstrated how PCB's are transported from aquatic systems into terrestrial food webs through the capture and consumption of aquatic insects by Spiders  and Herps. I thought this particularly appropriate for our classes interests.      One of the largest challenges in a study like this is to determine where the selected predators are obtaining most of their food from. To do this, the authors used a stable isotope analysis to identify the Carbon-13 and Nitrogen-15 ratios in both aquatic

Change is good...just ask a baby turtle

  Change is good, or so the old adage goes. But is that really true, or is it something said to create a silver lining when the world seems to be shifting at an uncomfortable pace. Not all change is good (just ask the climate), but for some creatures, a little variance can go a long way. Take, for example, the common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ). A recent study by Leivesley and Rollinson (2021) found that mimicking natural temperature fluctuations in incubating eggs had a beneficial effect in early-age immune response. The authors were interested in using immune response as a marker of fitness under the Charnov-Bull model. Their experimental design included four groups: a male promoting temperature (MPT; 24⁰ C) and a female promoting temperature (FPT; 28⁰ C), each split into constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Half of the eggs in each group were treated with an aromatase inhibitor, which effectively prevents female development even at the FPT. The idea is that if i