Skip to main content

Genomics of Developmental Plasticity in Animals

Recently, in class we have been discussing plasticity in a variety of different environments and functions. Phenotypic plasticity plays a very important role in organisms ability to respond to new environments and situations. I read a review the other day from Frontiers in Genetics, discussing the impact of genomics on developmental plasticity, and the effects that this plasticity can have upon adaptation in later life. 

One of the most interesting things about the review for me was the discussion about the potential mitigating effects of plasticity on the detrimental impacts of future climate change. As climate change progresses, it is likely that temperatures will fluctuate, and many biomes will change drastically in a relatively short period of time. As these changes occur, organisms will have to adapt, die out, or migrate. When organisms are forced to adapt it can be an enormous benefit to be more "plastic" in terms of traits. Greater plasticity allows an organism to survive in a greater range of environments and allows them to endure a greater variety of conditions. One particular example of this is when a change in climate alters the visual environment, resulting in an organism's camouflage being less effective than it was previously. A greater degree of plasticity in camouflage variety can help a predator catch prey, or a prey species avoid predators in a new environment. If a species does not have this plasticity in appearance they can easily appear out of place, and are much more easily spotted. And while organisms may already have to adapt to new climates and environments, in the future it will be a much greater requirement, and the pace at which changes occur will be much greater. Those species that cannot change will likely vanish. Greater degrees of plasticity are often genetic and heritable, so that more plastic parents will have more plastic offspring. By this process the whole population will generally become more and more plastic in a rapidly changing environment.

Lafuente E, Beldade P. 2019. Genomics of Developmental Plasticity in Animals. Frontiers in Genetics 10, doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00720

Comments

  1. I completely agree, with the climate changing many species will have to adapt (increase plasticity), migrate, or die. There has to be costs to plasticity though, if not then species will be selected for maximum plasticity which we don't observe. Species have select ranges of plasticity to specific stressors, so what is the cost? T. J. DeWitt tested phenotypic cost in freshwater snails where he found growth rates of snail shell sizes were inversely related to their genetic potential for a plastic response to predator presence. He has written other papers as well questioning the costs of phenotypic plasticity, where there are a number of theories. One prevailing theory though is the energetic cost needed to maintain sensory and regulatory machinery needed for plasticity. As to the direct costs of these, there is a lot of contention. Different taxa have different ways of maintaining these tools for plasticity. It will take a lot more research to parse these costs out across the animal kingdom.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are ecotoxicologists going to the dogs? No...but they should.

A few months ago I read an article about the Miami Heat basketball organization using Covid sniffing dogs to admit fans into the arena and was blown away. They can't actually detect the virus, but they can pick up the chemical differences in the composition of breaths exhaled between healthy and infected individuals (Dorman 2021). I've always heard about dogs being used to detect drugs and track fugitives, but the ability to detect a virus by sniffing a person's breath is just on a whole other level. I started thinking about possible applications and the idea of using dogs to detect pollutants in the environment came across my mind.  While researching the capabilities of these sniffing dogs, I searched for any examples or projects that involved using sniffing dogs as pollutant detectors and I came across an EPA proof of concept from 2003. The idea was to train sniffing dogs to be able to detect various environmental contaminants that range from house molds to illegal pestic

The Dark Side of Subsidies: PCB Transport in Riparian Food Webs

           A common theme in this course has been the discussion of different contaminants and how they enter and persist in natural systems. Identifying the levels at which these contaminants are entering the food web and their method of transport are crucial to assessing their risk. As we discussed this topic in class I was reminded of a paper I read during my Freshwater Ecosystems course and am very glad I went back and re-read it. Published in Ecological Applications, the authors Walters et. al demonstrated how PCB's are transported from aquatic systems into terrestrial food webs through the capture and consumption of aquatic insects by Spiders  and Herps. I thought this particularly appropriate for our classes interests.      One of the largest challenges in a study like this is to determine where the selected predators are obtaining most of their food from. To do this, the authors used a stable isotope analysis to identify the Carbon-13 and Nitrogen-15 ratios in both aquatic

Change is good...just ask a baby turtle

  Change is good, or so the old adage goes. But is that really true, or is it something said to create a silver lining when the world seems to be shifting at an uncomfortable pace. Not all change is good (just ask the climate), but for some creatures, a little variance can go a long way. Take, for example, the common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ). A recent study by Leivesley and Rollinson (2021) found that mimicking natural temperature fluctuations in incubating eggs had a beneficial effect in early-age immune response. The authors were interested in using immune response as a marker of fitness under the Charnov-Bull model. Their experimental design included four groups: a male promoting temperature (MPT; 24⁰ C) and a female promoting temperature (FPT; 28⁰ C), each split into constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Half of the eggs in each group were treated with an aromatase inhibitor, which effectively prevents female development even at the FPT. The idea is that if i