Skip to main content

Applying a Reaction Norm Framework to Examining Variability in Egg Size Produced by Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Queens

    Phenotypic plasticity arises through three primary mechanisms: genetic, environmental and the interaction between the two (Martin et al 2021). Although the Martin et al paper focused on applying the reaction norm framework to exploring immunology, I believe the premise can be extrapolated to other fields of ecological importance. For example, a November 2020 study from Amiri et al examined factors influencing variation in the size of eggs produced by honeybee (Apis mellifera) queens.

    Amiri et al found that certain genetic lineages produced larger eggs on average. However, there was significant variability of egg size produced by queens within the same lineage. This suggests that external factors, outside of genetics, influence egg size plasticity. Amiri et al looked into two environmental conditions that could influence egg size:  colony size and nutritional status. Colony size is a factor of the social environment within the hive. Queens within larger colonies produce smaller eggs size on average than conspecifics in small colonies. Nutritional status of the nest also significantly impacted egg size. Queens in overfed colonies produced significantly smaller eggs on average than queens in pollen-restricted colonies. Overall, genotype and colony size had a greater impact on eggs size than the experimentally manipulated food availability.

      The larger egg size is associated with greater survival of offspring. When presented with unfavorable conditions the queens produced larger eggs to ensure survival of offspring.  The ability of a queen to modulate egg size depending on environmental conditions might demonstrate a conserved life history strategy from a presocial ancestral line. Modern honeybees form complex hives where nurse worker bees provide brood care for offspring. Larger colonies have more workers available for brood care, therefore the queen does not need to invest in producing larger eggs. Survival in a larger colony will already surpass that of a small colony because of the surplus of nurse bees caring for brood.

    The reaction norm framework could further be applied to premise of the honeybee study to elucidate the degree at which a queen’s genotype produces certain egg sizes across a gradient of environmental factors. Amiri et al covered genetic and environmental factors that affect egg size as distinct mechanisms. However, they did not explicitly explore the interface of genetic and environmental factors. Despite not recognizing the interface of how genotype and environment give rise to plasticity, the researchers applied a reaction norm framework. They compared queens from the same genetic lineage in their environmental studies. In their examination of the effect of colony size, they found that sister queens similarly produced smaller eggs when in larger colonies. In smaller colonies, the sister queens also both produced larger eggs. Unfortunately, their interface studies only explored a binary of environmental factors (overfed vs. pollen restricted and large vs small colony size). Nonetheless, this research leaves room for future studies to examine the gradient of environmental factors that can affect egg size and consequently survivability. These metrics may be important tools for conservation and management of honeybee and other social bee populations.


Sources:

Amiri, E., Le, K., Melendez, C. V., Strand, M. K., Tarpy, D. R., & Rueppell, O. (2020). Egg‐size plasticity in Apis mellifera: honey bee queens alter egg size in response to both genetic and environmental factors. Journal of evolutionary biology, 33(4), 534-543.


Martin, L. B., Hanson, H. E., Hauber, M. E., & Ghalambor, C. K. (2021). Genes, Environments, and Phenotypic Plasticity in Immunology. Trends in immunology.



 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Environmental Trade-offs of Increased Antidepressant Use

       I came across an interesting sentiment the other day. In response to the generational expression  “kids have it so easy nowadays” someone replied “that’s the point”. The point of progressing is to make life easier for the next generation. While today’s kids don’t have to walk uphill both ways to get to school, they face their own unique obstacles with the constant pressures from social media and threat of school shootings. The 2021 State Of Mental Health In America survey reports that youth depression is worsening. Statistics show that this disproportionately affects youths who identify as more than one race. However, some statistical growth can be attributed to an increase in diagnoses as the stigma of mental health has changed and more people seek treatment. Along with better access to therapy, access to a variety of antidepressants has increased as well. The CDC reports that from 1999 to 2014 antidepressant use has increased by almost 65% with one in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Change is good...just ask a baby turtle

  Change is good, or so the old adage goes. But is that really true, or is it something said to create a silver lining when the world seems to be shifting at an uncomfortable pace. Not all change is good (just ask the climate), but for some creatures, a little variance can go a long way. Take, for example, the common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ). A recent study by Leivesley and Rollinson (2021) found that mimicking natural temperature fluctuations in incubating eggs had a beneficial effect in early-age immune response. The authors were interested in using immune response as a marker of fitness under the Charnov-Bull model. Their experimental design included four groups: a male promoting temperature (MPT; 24⁰ C) and a female promoting temperature (FPT; 28⁰ C), each split into constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Half of the eggs in each group were treated with an aromatase inhibitor, which effectively prevents female development even at the FPT. The idea is that ...
2 comments
Read more

The Fate of the Honey Bee

   There is often chatter about the need to protect whatever charismatic species has recently been marketed into public attention, and if lucky public concern. Often characterized as charismatic megafauna, species like the bengal tiger, the giant panda, or the humpback whale are flagship species of conservation programs. These species garner affection and concern so successfully that they introduce a degree of taxonomic bias in environmental protection. On the other hand, there are species that have been branded “uninteresting, strange, or ugly” making them uniquely difficult to protect (Purdue. 2016).        In the age of social media, charismatic species have been given a new platform. In the case of the honey bee, you might say the conversation is abuzz. Since 2007, Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) has become a serious source of concern and discourse (Bee-Health. 2019). And I often wonder, how did this species, being so taxonomically different from it’s ch...
1 comment
Read more